Download CSV
Scatter-Plot
## Application-level Performance

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; ft.A.2; Class A=256.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.A.8; Class A=256.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; ft.A.16; Class A=256.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.A.32; Class A=256.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.C.32; Class C=512.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.B.32; Class B=512.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; ft.B.16; Class B=512.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.B.8; Class B=512.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.W.32; Class W=128.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; ft.W.16; Class W=128.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.W.8; Class W=128.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ft.W.4; Class W=128.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; ft.W.2; Class W=128.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 2 Processors; ft.S.2; Class S=64.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 4 Processors; ft.S.4; Class S=64.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 8 Processors; ft.S.8; Class S=64.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 16 Processors; ft.S.16; Class S=64.0

### NAS Parallel FT Benchmark 2.0; IBM SP2 at ANL; 32 Processors; ft.S.32; Class S=64.0